<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pat Stack &#187; Gay Marriage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patrickstack.com/category/natl-politics/gay-marriage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patrickstack.com</link>
	<description>Digital strategist, Northwestern and Michigan grad, Chicago resident, Pittsburgh native.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 22:36:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Gay Marriage and the 2008 Campaign</title>
		<link>http://patrickstack.com/2008/05/16/gay-marriage-and-the-2008-campaign/</link>
		<comments>http://patrickstack.com/2008/05/16/gay-marriage-and-the-2008-campaign/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 05:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patrickstack.com/?p=203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I didn&#8217;t think this one would be back again as a campaign issue, but it seems that it will be. There are a few differences this time around. First, if campaigning were a video game, the G.O.P. already used the one-time, battleground-state-gay-marriage-ballot supermove to defeat the 2004 Democrats, leaving them without the ability to use [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t think <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/16/us/16marriage.html?_r=1&#038;partner=rssnyt&#038;emc=rss&#038;oref=slogin">this one</a> would be back again as a campaign issue, but it seems that it will be.</p>
<p>There are a few differences this time around.  First, if campaigning were a video game, the G.O.P. already used the one-time, battleground-state-gay-marriage-ballot supermove to defeat the 2004 Democrats, leaving them without the ability to use it again.  You can&#8217;t write the same amendment to a state constitution twice, so that&#8217;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Same-sex_marriage_legislation_in_the_United_States_by_state">out of the question in important electoral states</a> like Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin, Missouri and Kentucky It thus can&#8217;t be used to quite the same right-wing-voter motivation effect.</p>
<p>Second, <a href="http://lesbianlife.about.com/od/lesbianactivism/p/BarackObama.htm">Barack Obama doesn&#8217;t even support gay marriage</a>.  I had no idea that this was the case until I read it tonight. Liberal groups are apparently so excited that a liberal has a decent shot at the presidency that they have swept this normally liberal-upsetting factoid under the rug.  (How mature of my fellow bleeding hearts to accept political nuance for a change.)  Though Obama has an otherwise pro-gay-rights voting record, he is on the record against gay marriage.  So it&#8217;s not really something that can be used against him the same way it could against John Kerry, who was more vague on everything.  </p>
<p>I do, however, say that even as people continue to buy the Muslim rumor even after weeks of high-decibel tongue-clucking over Obama&#8217;s <strong>Christian</strong> pastor, so figuring out which smears will stick isn&#8217;t much of a logical pursuit.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/wNbLQ6DC8mw&#038;hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/wNbLQ6DC8mw&#038;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>
<p>Third, McCain is the candidate who is potentially the most impacted by this.  Does McCain come out strongly against the California court in a bid for more religious-conservative support?  Or does he stick to his relatively libertarian past talk on gay issues, in which he said he didn&#8217;t support a federal amendment banning gay marriage?  (That&#8217;s libertarian by moralistic-Republican standards; he still opposes gay marriage on moral grounds and supports &#8220;don&#8217;t ask, don&#8217;t tell&#8221;.)  I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;ll do anything beyond reiterating the &#8220;Marriage is between a man and a woman&#8221; boilerplate b.s.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/05/15/bush-compares-obama-to-na_n_101859.html">Godwin&#8217;s law has already come into play in this campaign</a>&#8212;by the President himself!&#8212;and we&#8217;re still five months out from the election.  While Bush technically compared Obama to Neville Chamberlain, I&#8217;m going to say that it still counts because Nazis were explicitly mentioned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://patrickstack.com/2008/05/16/gay-marriage-and-the-2008-campaign/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

